This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Contrasting Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

1042 words - 5 pages

Contrasting Hobbes and Locke

Nearly two-hundred and twenty-five years ago the
United States of America chose to fight a Thomas Hobbes
government, with the hope of forming a John Locke
institution. The ideas of these men lead to the
formation of two of the strongest nations in the history
of the world: Great Britain followed by the United
States. Thomas Hobbes viewed the ideal government as an
absolute monarchy, due to the chaos of the state of
nature in contrast, John Locke’s ideal government was a
democracy due to his beliefs of the equality of men.
These men have shared a few of the same beliefs, but
mainly contrast each other.
Thomas Hobbes believed that man by ...view middle of the document...

It was clear to Hobbes, that men
must group themselves together, with a leader capable of
ensuring obedience of these natural laws. It is
important that the group being governed is a large group
because the small groups are not stable. The addition of
only a few members with contrasting views to a small
group, could destroy the entire community. Thus, small
groups invite invaders and foster dissent. Hobbes to
accepted that man bestowing his power in one leader, “is
more than consent, or concord; it is a real unity of them
all, in one every man, I authorize and give up my right
of governing myself, to this man, or on this condition,
that thou give up thy right to him, and authorize all his
actions in like manner.” (CWT III, 38). The preceding
quote was Hobbes’s opinion of a social contract. This,
Hobbes believed, was essential to man escaping the state
of nature, and to the formation of a responsible
government. Through this, complete power should be
vested in one king, and the people who gave him this
power need to trust and abide by him at all times. They
are not to rebel, because rebellion would lead them back
to the chaos which they were trying escape. Basically,
Hobbes’s ideal state had rights against the people,
because it possessed all the sovereignty,and the people
had a responsibility to it.
Locke believed that man by nature is good. He lived
in a fairly peaceful era which had directly influenced
this view. Locke saw the state of nature as a state of
the natural freedom, of man; to order their actions, and
dispose of their positions and persons as they found fit
within the bounds of the laws of nature. The state of
nature, however, is not a state of license. (CWT,70).
This means although man has ability to deal with himself
and his belongings as he wishes, he does not have the
authority to act in a way which is destructive toward
himself or other persons because, in doing such, he is
breaking the...

Other Papers Like Contrasting Thomas Hobbes And John Locke

Social Contract Theory Of John Locke

1278 words - 6 pages system deals with every day. Not to debate a man of intellect like John Locke …but, I do believe that Thomas Hobbes said it best when he said “the weakest has strength enough to kill the strongest, either by secret machination or by confederacy with others that are in the same danger with himself (Hobbes, 1651).” Hobbes goes on to write that he believes that man is inherently evil. I see this more correct in today’s world. Where I come from it is

Hobbes Vs Locke Essay

1828 words - 8 pages James Wells 12/11/14 Hobbes vs. Locke This paper will compare and contrast the views of Thomas Hobbes and John Locke expressed in Leviathan and Second Treatise of Government. The paper will show the basic differences between the two philosophers views, is Hobbes' distrust of the people and Locke's relatively greater trust of the people and distrust of the government's power and the likelihood of the abuse of that power.  Hobbes' view in

The Resposibility Project

900 words - 4 pages to achieve this, they gave up their rights and freedoms freely to some authority by this contract who must command obedience. Thomas Hobbes believed that law should be dependent upon the sanction of the sovereign because it will preserve peace, life, and prosperity. The next philosopher is John Locke and his theory about social contract differed from that of Thomas Hobbes. According to John Locke man lived in a State of Nature, but his

Hello

405 words - 2 pages and is given its first full exposition and defense by Thomas Hobbes. After Hobbes, John Locke and Jean-Jacques Rousseau are the best known proponents of this enormously influential theory, which has been one of the most paramount theories within moral and political theory throughout the history of the modern West. More recently, philosophers from different perspectives have offered new criticisms of social contract theory. In particular, feminists

What Is Social Contract Theory?

2500 words - 10 pages everywhere he is in chains”. COMPARISION OF THE THEORY OF SOCIAL CONTRACT OF THOMAS HOBBES, JOHN LOCKE AND JEAN JACQUES ROUSSEAU 1. Hobbes asserts that without subjection to a common power of their rights and freedoms, men are necessarily at war. Locke and Rousseau, on the contrary, set forth the view that the state exists to preserve and protect the natural rights of its citizens. When governments fail in that task, citizens have the

To Be or Not to Be

799 words - 4 pages Hobbes versus Locke: State of Nature and Legitimacy By David Feinman In the study of political theory and the analysis of the role of the sovereign in western society, Thomas Hobbes and John Locke are two of the most in fluential figures. Their philosophies on the way in which man lived before forming societies have be en the backbone of the discussion of the state of nature and the legitimacy of the sovereign for ma ny centuries

The Basis Of The United States Government

1433 words - 6 pages the theories who use it has their basis are in turn questioned and can't be viably supported or be deemed valid reasons for constructing the very government we live by. Perhaps 'man' as a whole really can't be concluded into a theory. Maybe the individualism of humans is simply too unique to derive a only one conclusion. If so, is our government standing on a false foundation? Our country is young; our Democracy is still a world's child. "Why government?" is only answered based on the validity of "the science of man". Without that assumption we could never propose such a conclusion. Bibliography: Readings by John Locke & Thomas Hobbes

Economical Philosophy

1679 words - 7 pages Aristotle to highlight the fact that commerce was not the only means to acquire and sustain necessities. Contrary to the naturalistic view/basis for the right of acquisition by Aristotle, Locke tied religion into what he believed to be a natural right to require property with no regard to the circumstance or situation of society. Locke would defend his stance on natural property rights in contrast to another renowned philosopher, Thomas Hobbes

An Essay on Liberalism and Conservatism

1298 words - 6 pages the same rights and liberties men do (Curtis, 2008). Other prominent thinkers who are considered to be influential to liberal thought are John Locke who was mentionedpreviously, and Thomas Hobbes. Thomas Hobbes was a supporter of an absolutist government as an alternative to disorder. He believed that limiting the power of the government could prove harmful to the state and could plunge society into a “state of nature”. His work in Leviathan had

Thomas Hobbes: a English Philosopher

2512 words - 11 pages Thomas Hobbes Davis Mullins 4.16.09 A1/B1 Thomas Hobbes was an English philosopher and one of the most original political thinkers in the seventeenth century. He lived in a time when the absolutism was coming to an end and democracy was emerging for society. Thomas Hobbes was born during the Elizabethan Age, on April 5, 1588. He was premature and his birthplace is in

State

1553 words - 7 pages , in any given area of behavior, individuals remain free to do as they please so long as the ruler has not specifically indicated otherwise. In 1690 John Locke carried on the social contract tradition in his Second Treatise of Civil Government. He too envisions a state of nature, but it is much less grim than the version portrayed by Hobbes. Where Hobbes saw a condition of violence and terror, Locke perceived mere "inconveniences." In nature, he

Related Essays

Thomas Jefferson Vs. John Locke Essay

1354 words - 6 pages history books will tell that the contributing factors that formed Thomas Jefferson’s ideas of the identity of America were linked to events such as the Reformation, the Renaissance, and the British Country party. However, one man’s works continually surfaced in Jefferson’s political and even private writings. John Locke, a British Enlightenment philosopher, was repeatedly referenced in documents like the Declaration of Independence, the Notes on

Stuart Mill And John Locke Conception Of Freedom

2373 words - 10 pages Introduction John Locke (1632-1704) and John Stuart Mill (1806-1873) are two important thinkers of liberty in modern political thought. They have revolutionized the idea of human freedom at their time and have influenced many political thinkers afterwards. Although their important book on human freedom, John Locke’s The Second Treatise of Government (1689) and John Mill’s On Liberty (1859), are separated 170 years, some scholars thinks that they

Socrates And John Locke Essay

787 words - 4 pages universal agreement)? Is he right? In John Locke’s Essay Concerning Human Understanding, he addresses his argument against innate ideas, and how exactly our ideas are not innate, but rather gained from experience. His basic argument against innate ideas was that if we were to have innate knowledge, then the same type of knowledge would be imprinted in everyone’s head. He brings up that children and “idiots” do not possess, nor do they have the

John Winthrop "City Upon A Hill" And Thomas Jefferson "City Views"

649 words - 3 pages , which would provide a moral and religious show for the rest of the world to see. Quoting the New Testament, (Matthew 5:14) John Winthrop warned the people they would be totally exposed for the entire world to see, as a "city upon a hill."Not everyone agreed with John Winthrop's vision. Thomas Jefferson, for example, did not have the same view as Winthrop. Jefferson looked at Winthrop's views as radically idealistic and knew he was up against enormous