Comparing Government Systems: Parliament and Presidential
To start with, what is a parliament and presidential system of
Government? A parliamentry system of government is that government
that is headed by the Head of Government who gets into power by direct
'vote of confidence of the Parliament.E.g Britain,
A presidential system of Government is a system of government where
the executive branch is elected seperately from the legistative
branch. This differs from the Parliamentry system because there is no
vote of confidence and the citizenry of the counrty elect those they
want as their leader.E.g America, Nigeria and most Southe American
counties e.t.c. On the question of which is a better government
system, I will analyze further.
Theoretically, The presidential system seems to be a better system of
Government because the citizenry of ...view middle of the document...
BOTH SIDES OF THE ARGUMENT
1. In a presidential system, the central principle is that the
legislative and executive branches of government should be separate.
2 It is extremely rare for the president to have the power to directly
propose laws, or cast a vote on legislation.
3. A president is highly identifiable and accountable to voters.
4. In this system, there is a greater degree of choice for voters.
5. A president shows stability and continuity of policy- making.
6. In this system, there is centralization of authority in one person.
7. Its been noticed that this system brings about majoritarianism
which is associated to democratic failure.
1. This system of government is inclusive of all groups within the
executive unlike the presidential system.
2. There is flexibility in this government as coalitions can change
without a new appraoch to election.
3. This system helps to unify the executive and legislative arms of
government through checks and balances as the executive is dependent
on the confidence of the legislature which helps in democratic
4. In this system, there is possibility of executive deadlocks,
stalemates and immobilism.
5. Also, there are problems of accountability as decisions are taken
by the collective cabinet lack of stability in governance.
Adminstratively, the parliamentary system of government seems to be a
better form of government because everyone in the parliament
collectively works hand in hand with the prime minister to deliver
good governance to the people since they all have the same goals in
mind, unlike the presidential system where there are different parties
trying to work at all cost to see other parties fail, so that they can
be the people's party.
Conclusively, the presidential system of governance proves to be a
better form of governance as it woks with the directives of the
citizenry of the country or nation through national voting and not
vote of confidence.