Comparing Government Systems: Parliament And Presidential

586 words - 3 pages

Comparing Government Systems: Parliament and Presidential

To start with, what is a parliament and presidential system of
Government? A parliamentry system of government is that government
that is headed by the Head of Government who gets into power by direct
'vote of confidence of the Parliament.E.g Britain,

A presidential system of Government is a system of government where
the executive branch is elected seperately from the legistative
branch. This differs from the Parliamentry system because there is no
vote of confidence and the citizenry of the counrty elect those they
want as their leader.E.g America, Nigeria and most Southe American
counties e.t.c. On the question of which is a better government
system, I will analyze further.


Theoretically, The presidential system seems to be a better system of
Government because the citizenry of ...view middle of the document...



1. In a presidential system, the central principle is that the
legislative and executive branches of government should be separate.

2 It is extremely rare for the president to have the power to directly
propose laws, or cast a vote on legislation.

3. A president is highly identifiable and accountable to voters.

4. In this system, there is a greater degree of choice for voters.

5. A president shows stability and continuity of policy- making.

6. In this system, there is centralization of authority in one person.

7. Its been noticed that this system brings about majoritarianism
which is associated to democratic failure.


1. This system of government is inclusive of all groups within the
executive unlike the presidential system.

2. There is flexibility in this government as coalitions can change
without a new appraoch to election.

3. This system helps to unify the executive and legislative arms of
government through checks and balances as the executive is dependent
on the confidence of the legislature which helps in democratic

4. In this system, there is possibility of executive deadlocks,
stalemates and immobilism.

5. Also, there are problems of accountability as decisions are taken
by the collective cabinet lack of stability in governance.


Adminstratively, the parliamentary system of government seems to be a
better form of government because everyone in the parliament
collectively works hand in hand with the prime minister to deliver
good governance to the people since they all have the same goals in
mind, unlike the presidential system where there are different parties
trying to work at all cost to see other parties fail, so that they can
be the people's party.

Conclusively, the presidential system of governance proves to be a
better form of governance as it woks with the directives of the
citizenry of the country or nation through national voting and not
vote of confidence.

Other Papers Like Comparing Government Systems: Parliament And Presidential

From the Source and Your Own Knowledge, Assess the Current ‘Balance of Power Between Government, Parliament and the People’ in Relation to the British Constitution. (10 Marks)

920 words - 4 pages From the source and your own knowledge, assess the current ‘balance of power between government, parliament and the people’ in relation to the British constitution. (10 marks) In the UK, our constitution is described as uncodified in nature and so is found in a variety of sources dating back to the Magna Carta as well as statute and common law. These sources set up the rules for the relationship between Westminster and the people e.g. MPs and

Study of Goverment Systems Essay

1004 words - 5 pages between parliamentary and presidential systems? The main difference between a parliamentary and presidential system of government is that in a presidential system, the president is separate from the legislative body, but in a parliamentary system, the chief executive, such as a prime minister, is part of the legislative body, or parliament. A presidential system separates the executive and legislative functions of the government and provides what

Characteristics of Presidents

1685 words - 7 pages Chamberlain were constrained by the need to maintain the confidence of the Commons. Other supporters of presidential systems sometimes argue in the exact opposite direction, however, saying that presidential systems can slow decision-making to beneficial ends. Divided government, where the presidency and the legislature are controlled by different parties, is said to restrain the excesses of both parties, and guarantee bipartisan input into legislation

To What Extent Is The Uk’S Government Becoming More Presidential? Discuss

1122 words - 5 pages the monarchy is head of state. The Uk, for instance has a prime ministerial government, where Queen Elizabeth is head of state and David Cameron is the Executive. One could argue that the Uk’s government has become marginally presidential, as the need for a cabinet has become less over time. However, the UK are still a fused government in which powers are shared within parliament, unlike a presidential system. The tendency of Prime Ministers to

A Comparative Analysis of the British Parliamentary System and the American Presidential System

2184 words - 9 pages electorate. This is to ensure that no government falls to tyranny under the domination of a single ruler for an extended period of time.   There are some important differences between the British Parliamentary system and the American Presidential system that are largely formalities, or traditions that differ between the two systems. In the American system, the President serves as both the symbolic head of state and the political head of state

Improved Environmental Icu

588 words - 3 pages that all power is not rested in one indivdual. This can sometimes lead to situations where doing any legislation becomes very complex or nearlly impossible. In a parilamentary form of government a hung parlaiment or in a presidential form of government a President and Parliament from different political parties are examples of such complicated scenarios. A dictator can however carry out this action throught a decree. The problem faced by Indian

Political Institiions

1373 words - 6 pages have maintained stable democracy. The focus of the article is political stability, which Linz says is endangered by the so-called dual democratic legitimacy of presidential systems. In a parliamentary system, the head of government is selected by the legislature and can be dismissed by a legislative vote of no confidence. There is no equivalent means of breaking an executive-legislative impasse in a presidential system, in which the head of

Political Difinitions

560 words - 3 pages want to work in the Presidential Government. 18.Parliamentary Government: A parliament is a legislature, especially in those countries whose system of government is based on the Westminster system. -The Westminster system is a part of the Parliamentary Government. 19.Compromise: An agreement or a settlement of a dispute that is reached by each side making concessions. -Me and me friend had a

China and India Political and Economical Structures

4996 words - 20 pages , combining different factors such as kinship, agrarian systems and religious networks. When the British established their rule, it succeeded in bringing various regional and local units under a central government, which drew heavily on indirect rule through quasi-autonomous intermediaries, such as native princes, tribal leaders, and landlords (Almond, 2008, p 613). Beginning in 1920, Indian leader Mohandas K. Gandhi transformed the Indian National

Hungary Economic Crisis

1686 words - 7 pages January 3, 2011, the Hungarian government enacted legislation regulating the media and web-based publications against making hate towards the Hungary state. This move was criticised worldwide, causing Hungary to amend the problematic sections of the media law. Loophole Legislating Fidesz enacted many of these controversial policies through a loophole in the Hungarian legislating system. Instead of introducing bills to the parliament

Australian Two Party System

2180 words - 9 pages The Australian Westminster model promotes a two party system that in modern history has started to undermine parliamentary democracy. This has created potential conflict between the modern representative party system and the principles of the supreme authority of parliament supporting the Westminster model of accountable government. The Australian Westminster parliamentary system consists of an upper and lower house, with the lower house forming

Related Essays

Comparing The Scottish Parliament And Welsh Assembly

1587 words - 7 pages Comparing the Scottish Parliament and Welsh Assembly On the 1st of July 1999 the Scottish Parliament assumed its full powers and duties. This was a devolved government, where some legislative powers were transferred from Westminster to the Parliament in Scotland. The Scottish parliament was designed to embody the links between the people of Scotland, the members of the Scottish Parliament and the Scottish Executive. The

Comparing Unix And Windows Operating Systems

1204 words - 5 pages operating systems and which one would you use? This paper will investigate and analyze some of the similarities and difference between two major Operating Systems; UNIX and Windows XP by comparing and contrasting with some key features such as; cost measurements, market share availability, hardware requirements, file processing, programming capabilities, availabilities of applications software and graphical user interface (GUI) with the hopes of

Comparing The Political Systems Of Uk And Morocco

1203 words - 5 pages the events of the “Arab Spring”, yet the country has a long democratization process to achieve. The constitutional reform that was launched by His Highness the King Mohammed VI is a decisive step for Morocco to become a democratic state. Comparing the political systems of the United Kingdom and Morocco is an interesting subject of study. Both countries are very old monarchies but share only some few characteristics. Throughout this essay, we

Comparing Hong Kong And United States Heath Care Systems

1182 words - 5 pages Amanda Newcomer <Course> November 01, 2013 <Instructor> Comparing Hong Kong and United States Heath Care Systems The United States is currently in the process of a health care reform which will change the current private sector health care program into a universal healthcare system. A great example of a universal healthcare program is Hong Kong. There are other countries that have changed from a private to a public health