Case Study Analysis
Majida Ismaili Alaoui
November 25, 2012
The peer review process is a positive asset, and neutral tool. The benefit of the review, allowed me to pinpoint my weaknesses, and reinforce my strength in writing. The objectivity of the review, made me feel comfortable, and allow me to take the criticism from its positive side, therefore I will make a serious effort to rectify my mistakes and take in consideration my peers feedback. My reaction to the peers’ comments was positive as it helped me see the reader perspective to my work, which is a reflective mirror. In consequences, I reflected on the message I intended to send through this ...view middle of the document...
To make matters worst, Carl has not coordinated an effort with the administration, and the IT department to reserve the room for the training of these new hires on June 15. Carl showed an extreme lack of follow-up and organization.
Carl has three main issues that could put his credibility at risk as a new hiree himself. The first issue is that Carl has taken the initiative to hire 15 people in a short period. He should have taken more time in familiarizing himself with the company policy and its hiring procedure, instead of stepping in by overpromising Monica that these new hires will be operational by July. The second issue is that Carl missed a fundamental part of the completion of the hiring process. The applicants’ files were not complete. The third issue is that the IT department has reserved the room; he presumed would be for the training orientation for the new employees.
The company downfalls consist of on delegating a huge responsibility to a new manager to hire a certain number of employees. The company should have run a background check and searched through references about the abilities and the managerial skills of Carl. It is also evident that ABC, Inc., lack organization. A big company like ABC cannot afford pages missing in its manual, which systematically affect its image and reputation. A deeper view to this issue it could mean also that there are no rules to follow, if the guide of the company is not complete. An employee or manager, when confused, refer to the manual of the company, and return to when they do not have an answer to the guidelines that he or she needs to respect and not to crossover. The company’s integrity is another issue that its CEO needs to address in a meeting. A lack of communication and follow up between its team members is clearly illustrated. Monica, Joe, and Carl seemed disconnect, as if they were working independently. They needed to be more involved and working together to preserve the interest of the company, therefore its image, and reputation in the market world. In this particular case, Carl needed to ask for assistance, instead of taking the task by himself without alerting his team members. Monica, instead of contacting Carl, she should have scheduled a meeting with him, to find out where is he at and what kind of insight she can contribute to finalize the hiring process. Joe in his turn should have alerted and communicated with the team members, not only by putting in the schedule that he would be occupying the training room for the whole month, for computer orientations. Assuming that everyone in the team will check the schedule.
After identifying the problems and the issues surrounding them. Carl has to focus on the solutions, and their implementations. Carl has to schedule a meeting with Monica and Joe, to discuss alternatives to this dead end. The purpose of the interview is recognizing that he fails to ask for assistance, thinking he can bring the company to higher level by...