The human rights activists are against this type of punishment
I believe in second chances.
The Disadvantages of Death Penalty
* Though there are scientific methods available to investigate the crime, nothing is guaranteed. You cannot remove the chances of punishing innocents completely.
* The cost involved on the death penalty prosecution is greater than the expenses occurred in the life imprisonment of the accused. The appeals against such capital punishments take too long to decide, and often it takes years to decide the fate of the death penalty. All these things make the death penalty an expensive option for the governments who spend millions of the dollars of the taxpayer ...view middle of the document...
Since 1995 until the present, its death row convicts have averaged 3,000 per year.
We Have Executed A Minor Before.
With the uproar nowadays over the Pangilinan Law which critics say have essentially allowed minors to commit crimes with impunity, a time occurred when the country really did—and could legally—execute a minor since they were considered adults at the time.
In this case, the offender was none other than Marcial “Baby” Ama who was only 16-years old when he was executed via electric chair. At the time, the law considered the legal age for men and women to be 16 and 14 respectively. Ama himself earned his sentence after leading one of the biggest jail riots in history which resulted in the deaths of nine inmates, one of them having been beheaded.
Specifically, the Supreme Court imposed the death penalty after finding him guilty for stabbing to death a man named Almario Bautista during the riot.
Only The Philippines And The US Have Ever Used The Electric Chair.
Believe it or not, only two countries in the world have ever used the electric chair—the United States and the Philippines (in fact, it is still being used in certain US states today).
The Philippines adopted electrocution after the US brought in an electric chair in 1926. The country continued to use the chair until 1976 when the firing squad replaced it as the preferred method of execution.
Capital punishment is not necessary because there is another equally effective and less undesirable means of dealing with crime. Life imprisonment is just as effective as capital punishment in preventing and deterring crime. The condemned criminal cannot continue his evil actions under close supervision, and the fear of life imprisonment will deter potential criminal from doing wrong. Moreover, life imprisonment is a lesser evil than capital punishment. Admittedly, it inflicts loss of freedom, personal humiliation and extreme boredom upon the criminal. But suffering is required by the very nature and purpose of punishment, and these evils are less cruel than death and the agony of awaiting death. Since the death penalty is an unnecessary evil and it is always wrong to do unnecessary evil, capital punishment is always wrong.
The Moral Law
Capital punishment is always wrong because it is always a violation of moral laws. The moral law consists of those rules that specify which kinds of acts are morally right and which kinds are morally wrong. Historically, it has been thought of in various ways. In the Judeo-Christian tradition, the moral law is usually taken to be the set of commands issued by God, whether limited to the Ten Commandments or including the many mandates inscribed in the book of the bible. Rationalistic philosopher have tended to ignore or reject revelation and think of moral laws as self-evident truths about right and wrong discoverable by the natural light of human reason. However the moral law may be conceived, it is usually presumed to...