Is capital punishment the best option? Capital Punishment is the execution of an offender sentenced to death after conviction by a court of law of a criminal offense. In other words, it is a legal process where a person is sentenced to death as a punishment of a crime. While there is much to say about capital punishment, this paper will focus on history, method of executions, and controversy. In this essay we are going to focus just in the state of Florida. Therefore, the history of capital punishment in the state of Florida is where we shall begin.
The death penalty has been a legal way of punishment in the United States for capital crimes since English common law was enforced in the Colonies. However, in the state of Florida it has been legal approximately only for forty years. When executions first started being carried out in Florida, the executions were carried out by the county, rather than the state. Then, when executions were placed under state ...view middle of the document...
The sodium thiopental is used for anesthesia induction and for medically induced coma. The pancuronium bromide is a paralytic agent that acts by stopping the respiratory muscles, leading to a death in a very short time. The potassium chloride affects the electrical conduction of heart muscle causing electrical potential of the heart muscle cells to be lower than normal. On the other hand, execution by electrocution is usually performed using an “electric chair,” in which the condemned person is strapped to a special wooden chair and electrocuted through electrodes placed on his or her body. Putting “enlightened” execution methods aside, perhaps a more important question to be considered in capital punishment is whether innocent people are being executed.
Some people think that the death penalty is the worst violation of human rights. However, other people see the death penalty as a way of punishing heinous crimes. Opponents of capital punishment do not agree with the idea that all people that have committed a crime must be murdered as a punishment for their acts. They point out that there have been cases where people have been found innocent many years after their executions. Unmoved by opponents of capital punishment, supporters of the death penalty strongly believe the death penalty should be enforced in cases such as murder, especially with aggravating elements, like multiple homicide, child murder, and massive killings such as terrorism or genocide. According to death penalty supporters, the death penalty is an effective deterrent to crime; yet, it has been proven that states with the death penalty actually have higher murder rates than those without it!
In conclusion, it seems to me that capital punishment is not the best option for societies with high rates of murders. The death penalty violates the right to life. The idea that the State wishes to show that murder is wrong by murdering people is absurd and contradictory. More worrisome is that innocent people are possibly executed for crimes they did not commit. Capital punishment should be replaced with life without parole. It is a sufficient substitute for those who have committed awful crimes. The death penalty is murder, and nothing less, whether it is done by the State or an individual. It is wrong.