Capital punishment is the legal process where a person may have to pay the ultimate price with death. Many countries have abolished capital punishment, and these countries seem like they are on the right path. They think nobody deserves death no matter the circumstance or do they? Capital punishment is like a double edge sword. The motto, "Eye for an Eye" is that really justice or murder. In the victim's eye, that is justice but for the convicted family members nothing but murder. How do we justify murder in our legal system?
If our legal system convicts someone of murder with the capital punishment, why not sentence to death immediately. Do we really need to prolong the time if there is not doubt that they committed the crime? What purpose does that serve? ...view middle of the document...
In the same sense, what if the person is wrongly convicted and again the legal system loop holes puts an innocent person to death. Who could live with knowing you executed the wrong person? Nowadays, accusing the wrong individual is highly unlikely, since the United States has an assortment of advanced technologies and top notch investigators.
Long term and harsh imprisonment could be the solution. If the sentence was more than just being locked up with a warm bed to sleep in, three square meals a day and free medical/dental. Prisoner need to experience hard labor as they did in the old days. If we ran the prisons and not the let prisoners run the asylum. Make the inmates do the hard time, or hard labor maybe they will think twice in committing the crime. In some cases an inmate might think they are doing too much work. This is not hard to solve because the time and intensity of work will be decided by the crime committed. All in all, this would reduce the crime rate because nobody wants to be forced to work because they did something foolish.
In conclusion, capital punishment should be revised to evict some of its major flaws. If someone is convicted of murder and no doubt of their guilt, then that said they should be put to death, no questions asked upon conclusion of the trial and sentence by some other means than lethal injection. That is a humane way to put someone to death but I'm afraid that it doesn't strike fear in a lot of people and they simply just don't care. Then the debate ensues the humane way for death, but did the victim have a choice in the humanity of death. Then are we ever sure of, without reasonable doubt of their guilt. It's unfortunate, but that's the world we live in.