The definition of behavioral learning is as follows, the relatively permanent change in behavior brought forth as a result of experience or relocation. My research paper is based on my understanding of the behaviorist theory and my similarities to its educational reasoning. The Behaviorist theory has been well known through out the education and phycology fields many decades and has contributed a great deal to the way we as Americans have learned to instruct or teach or students. John B. Watson is credited as the originator of behaviorism but it can be debated B. F. Skinner made a greater contribution to behaviorist. He took the study of behavior and made it a science. As I conducted my data collection for this research paper I read a few articles, which believed behaviorism has failed or will fail to truly be an effect learning theory. There reasoning behind this argument is for the most part wrapped around Skinner’s failure to provide validity for behaviorism and the ...view middle of the document...
Children who act in accordance with parental guidelines or approval should be given praise more often then tangible gifts. The opposite should be issued to children to deter non-constructive behavior.
B. F. Skinner’s approach to keep the reward system meaningful and keeping children from establishing motivational reward patterns he proposed a reinforcement schedule that is established after a specific response is garnered or achieved and instead of rewarding each time a rewarding schedule will be set up Brewer (2007). Children in the early stages of physical child development need positive environments and repetitive history productive activity and constructive learning arrangements. This is the basis for maximizing results while incorporating the behaviorist model.
Now that I have written about the behaviorist theory and its physical developmental relationship, I will now explore the social development of children and its relation to the behaviorist model. As human beings we are naturally social beings and we learn daily through different paradigms we are presented with and these experiences help us learn based on our interaction with our environment. The behavioral model communicates that the decisions we make in our environment have direct consequences, whether good or bad, and these consequences will affect our decision-making capabilities, either by tempting us to repeat actions more often with good consequences or less often with bad consequences. This is the social element at work as it relates to the behaviorist theory.
The behaviors we exhibit through out our development can explain emotional make up or at the very least tie in emotional development to the human experience. It is my belief that social-emotional development plays a major in the overall understanding of an individual’s cognitive collective. This leads me to assume that healthy, positive emotional functioning is a direct reflection of a history of healthy, positive, emotional behavior, which brings back the behaviorist model full circle. “Emotions are the principle guides and motivators of the behavior and learning from infancy throughout life. Both positive and negative emotions- joy, interest, surprise as well as anger, sadness, and fear all play important roles in this emotional development Hyson (2004)”.