Assess Usefulness Of Functionalist Approach For Crime

1405 words - 6 pages

Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the usefulness of functionalist approaches in explaining crime. (21 marks)

In reference to Item A functionalism is a consensus theory, stating that in society we are governed by a value consensus that we all share. This means we all are socialised into the shared values, beliefs and norms of society.

Functionalism uses this idea of value consensus to explain how crime is the result of not following this. It also explains how crime has functions in society and how it can play and integral part in society.

Functionalists believe that crime is the effect of inadequate socialisation. This is because we are all individuals with our own ...view middle of the document...

For instance, Davis argues that males use prostitution as a safety valve for their sexual frustrations without threatening the nuclear family. 4. Warning light is another function, in that if the crime rates of suicide and truancy go up it could indicate issues within society that need to be tackled.
However there have been some criticisms of this, first that it assumes there is a value consensus in society, yet Taylor argues that we are so multicultural and diverse that there is no one set of values and norms we all face, there are areas in the UK which are under Shiria law, so we a can’t even say that the law brings out cultural values together because some people don’t follow it directly. As well as this there are more criticisms in that it cannot be measure how much deviance is the right amount of deviance. For instance is there a numerical limit on the number of deviance before the police and other forces step in, in the same way there is a limit of how much your child can misbehave before the time out step can be enforced? If this assumption that there is a certain number of deviance that is functional is correct, then the implication is that police will not arrest or deal with a murder or sex crime if that crime is not the number which they can get to before they investigate. Crimes and deviant behaviours will be ignored which is arguably not functional for society. Also, functionalism tends to forget the main point about crime and deviance which is what function crime has on the victim. Arguably there is no function of crime the the victim, they have been involved in the bad end of a crime and they are left feeling isolated. In fact the function of crime is to isolate individuals not bring them together through boundary maintenance. However on the other hand it is useful in showing how crime is an integral part of society, whether that is right or wrong, it does explain what part it could play and why we let it happen in society.

Alternative to the functionalist perspective is Merton’s strain theory which agrues that the reason crime exists is not because of poor socialisation of individuals but instead, because of really great socialisation so much so that people feel a strain between what society wants them to achieve; riches, wealth and success; and what they can actually achieve legitimately. Merton argues that crime is the result of an individual feeling the strain between legitimate shared goals in society and the legitimate means to get them. He identifies 5 responses to this strain which he believes explains crime more so than Functionalists can; 1. conformity, accepting the goals and the means, 2. innovation, accepting the means but not the ways of getting there because of socio-economic factors which prevent legitimate means (education), 3. ritualism, meaning they accept the means but have given up on the goals- teachers who give on student success but still do their job, 4. retreatism where they reject the means and the...

Other Papers Like Assess Usefulness of Functionalist Approach for Crime

Functionalist Theory of Crime Essay

1254 words - 6 pages Functionalist Theory Of Crime Functionalism (The Consensus structuralism theory) Functionalism is a consensus structuralism theory. Functionalists argue that there is nothing abnormal about deviance, and that it is necessary and normal in all parts of societies performing a positive function. The functions of crime and deviance (DURKEIM)Durkheim has identified a positive and a negative side to crime and deviance, it is positive in which it

Assess The Functionalist View Of Education

1034 words - 5 pages . Functionalist believe that schools provide a level playing field to assess the abilities of students and the qualifications they gain are the basis for their career path. This ensures that people achieve jobs, responsibilities and pay to commensurate with their talents. In juxtaposition, Marxists would say that yes, school ensures that the middle class get the best jobs- but the hidden curriculum ensures working class children end up in rubbish

Functionalist Explanations of Crime and Deviance

2608 words - 11 pages Functionalist Explanations of Crime and Deviance Functionalist’s believe that shared norms and values are the basis of social order and social solidarity. They see crime and deviance as dysfunctional to society. However, functionalist’s do see some crime as being ‘normal’. Merton took functionalist views further by saying that crime and deviance were a strain between the socially accepted goals of society and the socially approved means

Assess The Functionalist View Of The Role Of Education

1367 words - 6 pages Introduction Assess the role of education form the functionalist perspective Functionalists believe that education performs very important roles for individuals, the economy and the wider social structure. It provides secondary socialisation, passing on shared culture enables individuals to develop their potential and regulates their behaviour. Functionalists argue that education has three broad; socialisation where education helps to maintain

Assess the Usefulness of Different Sociological Approaches to Suicide

1061 words - 5 pages Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the usefulness of different sociological approaches to suicide There are many different sociological views which approach suicide. Positivists think that suicide can be explained simply by looking at official statistics and there are distinct reasons for every suicide. Interpretists think that there is a reason behind every suicide and this can be found through qualitative studies. Realists think

Assess Sociological View of Crime Reduction Strategies

1179 words - 5 pages Assess sociological view of crime reduction strategies. Sociologist look at ways in which crime can be prevented in a way to reduce crime rates, for this reason a variety of different crime strategies have been put forward. One sociologist which looks at this, addressed in item A is Wilson et al who looked bat environmental crime reduction. He believed that if a piece of property was that by leaving property’s abandoned and broken windows

Assess the Usefulness of Interactionist Approaches to the Study of Society. (33marks)

2104 words - 9 pages Assess the usefulness of interactionist approaches to the study of society. (33marks) Interactionism is an action approach, which focuses on the individual, and tries to understand and interpret human behaviour. They focus on the study of individuals, and how society is constructed by members’ interactions and meanings. They also focus on how human action is meaningful and can be interpreted by an observer. Therefore they take an opposite

Assess the Usefulness of Micro Sociology to Our Understanding of Society

1118 words - 5 pages Assess the usefulness of micro sociology to our understanding of society (33marks) Micro sociology focuses on the actions and interactions of individuals and is a bottom-up approach. Such micro approaches, see society as shaped by its members, who possess agency, in other words, the ability to act as free agents. Micro approaches, also known as action theories, include social action theory, symbolic interactionism, phenomenology and

Assess the Usefulness to Marketing Management of Ajzen’s (1991) “Theory of Planned Behaviour”

2650 words - 11 pages In submitting this assignment I hereby confirm that: * I have read and understood the University’s policy on academic misconduct. * I confirm that this assignment is all my own work. * I confirm that in preparing this piece of work I have not copied any other person’s work, or any other pieces of my own work. * I confirm that this piece of work has not previously been submitted for assessment on another programme. Assess the

Evaluate the Usefulness of Labelling Theory to Our Understanding of Crime and Deviance (40 Marks)

1340 words - 6 pages Evaluate the usefulness of labelling theory to our understanding of crime and deviance (40 marks) Synopticity – Crime & Deviance and Theory Labelling theorists such as Becker and Lemert argue that because of the diversity of different values in society, there can never be a universally agreed definition of what constitutes ‘normal’ or ‘deviant behaviour’. What is deviant for one person may not be deviant for another. Labelling theorists

Asses the Functionalist View That a Small Amount of Crime Is Useful to Society

1032 words - 5 pages Assess the functionalist view that a small amount of crime is useful to society There is a long running argument between sociologists about the existence of crime and deviance and whether or not it can benefit societies in some ways. Many of them in the functionalist point of view argue that it can however, there are many, for example Marxists and feminists, which would argue that it doesn’t benefit anyone. Durkheim, the ‘founding father’ of

Related Essays

Using Material From Item A And Elsewhere, Assess The Usefulness Of Functionalist Approach In Explaning Crime

1306 words - 6 pages Using material from Item A and elsewhere, assess the usefulness of functionalist approaches in explaining crime (21 marks) Deviance is defined as the state of diverging from usual or accepted standards whereas crime is defined as an action or omission which constitutes an offence and is punishable by law. Usually, we would expect that functionalists would regard crime and deviance as wholly negative. However, functionalists such as Durkheim see

Assess The Usefulness Of Functionalist Approaches In Explaining Crime

993 words - 4 pages Assess the usefulness of functionalist approaches in explaining crime. (21 marks) In this essay one will assess the view of functionalists and how they approach their view of the causes of crime. Functionalisms over all view is to try understand how society shapes us by using a positivist view. Crime is defined as an action which constitutes an offence and is punishable by law. One will

Assess The Usefulness Of Functionalist Approaches In Explaining Crime. (21)

987 words - 4 pages Functionalists look at society as a whole. They explain crime and deviance by stating that the source of deviance lies in the nature of society rather than the individual. Durkheim states that crime and deviance is inevitable and a certain level is necessary for society to exist. He also claims that it is a positive aspect of society as it shows examples of rights and wrongs within society and by punishing offenders, through ways such as public

Using Material From Item A And Elsewhere, Assess The Usefulness Of Subcultural Theories In Explaining `subcultural Crime And Deviance' In Society Today. (21 Marks)

782 words - 4 pages delinquents share their own deviant subcultural values different to those of the middle class. In their view there are 3 delinquent subcultures that emerge as a response to blocked opportunities in order to try and continue to achieve success thought other means. The criminal subculture: where there is already the presence of adult crime in an area and they act as role models in order for individuals to learn and then climb the criminal hierarchy