Arthur Andersen Llp Essay

2907 words - 12 pages

Capstone case study on organizational architecture
Arthur Andersen LLP[1]

Introduction and Overview

It is difficult to find an example of a more spectacular business failure than the recent collapse of Arthur Andersen. Within a few years, Andersen moved from one of the largest professional service organizations in the world to almost complete collapse. The impact of the firm’s failure on its employees, customers, investors, and the general public is hard to overstate. The once proud reputation had been reduced to shambles. Even the President of the United States joked:

“We just received a message from Saddam Hussein. The good news is that he’s willing to have his ...view middle of the document...

Our purpose is to not to present all the relevant analysis ourselves. Rather it is to provide readers with the opportunity for an integrated analysis and capstone discussion of an important business problem that relies on material drawn from across the chapters in Part 3 of this book. It also provides a forum for discussing the root causes of the recent business scandals that have rocked the international business community.

Arthur Andersen: The Early Years

A 28-year-old Northwestern accounting professor, named Arthur Andersen started his own business in 1914. Andersen’s strategy was to offer high-quality accounting services to clients — promoting integrity and sound audit opinions over higher short-run profits. Soon after Andersen formed the firm, the president of a local railroad demanded that he approve a transaction that would have lowered his company’s expenses and increased its reported earnings. Andersen, who was not sure he could even meet his firm’s payroll, told the president that there was “not enough money in the city of Chicago” to make him do it. The president promptly severed his relationship with Andersen. However, Andersen was soon vindicated when the railroad filed for bankruptcy a few months later.
In the 1930s, the federal government adopted new laws to require public companies to submit their financial statements to an independent auditor every year. These regulatory changes, along with Andersen’s reputation, helped the firm to grow. During these formative years, the organization continued to promote its “four cornerstones” of good service, quality audits, well-managed staff, and profits for the firm. Quality audits were valued more than higher short-run firm profits. Leonard Spacek, who succeeded Andersen as managing partner in 1947, produced more company folklore when he accused powerful Bethlehem Steel of overstating its profits in 1964 by more than 60 percent. He also led a crusade to motivate the Securities and Exchange Commission to crack down on companies that cooked their books. The yellowing press clippings of his bold efforts were still on display at the company’s main training center near Chicago in 2002.
Between 1914 and the late 1980s, “tradition was everywhere” at Arthur Andersen. The company installed heavy wooden doors at the entrance of all its offices. Andersen employees were known to be “one of a kind” — clean-cut, straight-laced, and dressed in pinstripes. Employees were taught to recite the partnership’s motto, “Think straight, talk straight.” Auditors were rewarded and promoted for making sound audit decisions. Top management assigned significant decision rights to the central office’s Professional Standards Group.” This group, which consisted of internal experts, monitored audits and issued opinions on how specific types of transactions should be handled. The objective was to promote consistent and well-reasoned opinions throughout the firm.
Andersen’s...

Other Papers Like Arthur Andersen Llp

Enron Scandal Essay

1788 words - 8 pages dollar charge. Arthur Andersen, LLP, should have noticed these problems internally and been fixed sooner, but due to very complicated financial maneuvers they were never found. Andersen did not move to ever investigate Enron, because they were so closely tied with Enron executives and they were making a lot more money serving as a consulting firm to Enron then they were as auditors. When Andersen finally found the problem with the accounting

Enron Movie Review

1252 words - 6 pages the World’s respected and large accounting firm, Arthur Andersen, LLP from the ‘big five’. 5. Use the fraud triangle to identify fraudulent issues in the Movie. The issues should be categorized according to the three factors Pressure Pressure is what causes persons to commit fraud. * Management felt pressured to ensure profits rose and then the stock prices rose to attract more and more investors. * A ‘survival of the fittest

Enron

990 words - 4 pages losses through offshore "shell" companies. The company's accounting firm, Arthur Andersen LLP, was mature and well esteemed; not even a single person supposed it would take part in corporate swindle, making Enron appear virtuous (Ferrell, Fraedrich & Ferrell, 2013). Enron executives submitted an application for and were consequently awarded government deregulation. Because of this pronouncement of deregulation, Enron executives were allowed to

How to Succeed

1066 words - 5 pages 2000’s called attention to the importance of abiding by professional accounting standards. In 2002 a major public accounting firm, Arthur Andersen LLP, was indicted on criminal charges for its role in thwarting the government’s investigation into Enron’s accounting practices. As a result, that company, Arthur Andersen LLP, will most likely never recover. Moreover, under the Sarbanes Oxley Act of 2002 was passed by Congress in response to

Case 12.4: Surfer Dude Duds, Inc.:

700 words - 3 pages as a going concern for Enron. If Andersen has looked into the company’s ability to continue as a going concern, the discrepancies would have been found sooner. “In the end, Arthur Andersen, LLP, settled the malpractice lawsuit out of court for $217 million without admitting any wrongdoing.” (p.144) CPA licenses were revoked for two of the firm’s partners who were a part of the audit. Mark could use the Enron/Anderson case as an example of

Sarbanes-Oxley Act of 2002

1213 words - 5 pages , the Securities and Exchange Commission began investigating Enron and found that the company was guilty of fraudulent accounting. The company filed bankruptcy in December 2001. Along with Enron’s downfall, their auditing firm, Arthur Andersen LLP, was investigated and admitted to destroying many of Enron’s auditing documents. Their assistance in the Enron scandal destroyed the firm’s very credible reputation, which had held strong since the

Effectiveness of Sox Act

1345 words - 6 pages place during the latter years of the previous century and in the beginning of 2000. These actions obviously triggered a high level of uncertainty regarding the accuracy and reliability of financial statements by investors, creditors and other agents. Moreover, this also contributed to less confidence in the audit profession since one of the most well-known auditing and assurance firms, Arthur Andersen LLP, was involved in the Enron case

Worldcom Case Study

1878 words - 8 pages . Secondly, the external auditor firm Arthur & Andersen also failed to detect the accounting fraud due to multiple reason i.e. (i) the auditor was not allow to talk to few employees, (ii) auditor was not having access to the computerized financial system and (iii) the auditor was using standard approach instead of risk based and substantive approach (Ira Millstein, 2005) while evaluating the company books. Last but not the least, the company

Accountant Responsibility

1885 words - 8 pages Gillespie v. Seymour, the plaintiff disputed this statute on state constitutional grounds. The court stated that it did not violate the Kansas Bill of Rights and the Kansas limitation on third-party liability under professional negligence was upheld (Moore, 2011). In 1985, a New York decision revised the strict privity rule as the "near privity" rule. In the case of Credit Alliance v. Arthur Andersen & Co., the court developed the following three part

Coca Cola

2111 words - 9 pages example of the consequences of the neglect of individual and organizational integrity capacity (Cruver 2002; Swartz and Watkins 2002). Furthermore, the frantic effort of Arthur Andersen, LLP, one of Enron’s critical stakeholders whose integrity capacity and reputation were shattered by their unprofessional auditing services, to stem the tide of fleeing clients while negotiating with other “Big Five” accounting firms for sale of parts of its

Chapter 1

5648 words - 23 pages in American history to do so. The extent of the accounting irregularities and fraud being investigated and disclosed brought into question the effectiveness of financial statement audits. In addition, the criminal conviction of Arthur Andersen, LLP, one of the then Big 5 accounting firms, on charges of destroying documents related to the Enron case brought into question the ethical standards of the profession. 1–2 Assurance services are

Related Essays

Arthur Andersen Essay

829 words - 4 pages found the company guilty, and as a result Arthur Andersen had little choice but to surrender its CPA license, a move that effectively put Arthur Andersen out of business, at least in the US. Later, in the case of Arthur Andersen LLP v United States 544 US 696 [2005], however, the conviction of Arthur Andersen on charges relating to obstruction of justice were overturned by the US Supreme Court on the basis that there had been inconsistencies in

Business Research Ethics Essay

785 words - 4 pages failed to disclose all the necessary information on the reports. In this particular situation as stated above several parties were hurt with the outcome. Arthur Andersen auditors lost their credibility and showed no integrity. “Arthur Andersen was once known as a major player of the Big 5 accounting firms (SEC,2008) and now has dwindled to just a small LLP” (Edelmon & Nicholson, 2011, para. two.) Enron disappeared. A tremendous amount of

Auther Anderson Essay

1454 words - 6 pages Ferrell, O. C., Fraedrich, J., & Ferrell, L. (2011). Business Ethics: Ethical Decision Making and Cases US: South-Western, Cengage Learning. Haig, M. (2008). “Going for the auditors,” The Economist, December 29, 2010, http://www.economist.com/node/17800083?story_id=1780008 Arthur Andersen LLP v. The United States, FindLaw, http://caselaw.lp.findlaw.com/scropts/getcase.pl?court=US&vol=04-368 Markoff, Gabriel, Arthur Andersen and the Myth

Nobody Won Essay

2756 words - 12 pages Nobody Won Michelle L Brown Oklahoma Wesleyan University Abstract When the Arthur Andersen LLP/Enron scandal surfaced in 2001, there was much confusion as to whom committed what crime and how many employees were actually involved. After the facts and criminal charges were final, the sequence of events makes sense; the union of two companies, the rise of the participating executives, and finally the end of the money ride. The leaders of