This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

Aristotle Function Argument Essay

2280 words - 10 pages

Explain Aristotle’s human function argument. Does it provide a good basis for understanding eudaimonia?
The link between the human function argument and eudaimonia has been harshly criticised due to it being based upon three questionable claims: that human beings have a function, that the good for a human being resides on the fulfilment of that function and that being a good human being leads to eudaimonia. I will nevertheless show that once the concepts of eudaimonia, virtue and human function are correctly understood, it is possible to answer many of the objections that criticise the human function argument as a good basis for the understanding of eudaimonia.
In Nicomachean Ethics, ...view middle of the document...

But even if we accept this claim, what can this function be? Aristotle argues that it must be something which is peculiar to humans, which leads him to exclude the life of nutrition and growth and the life of perception we share with animals and arrive at the conclusion that the human function must consist in the activity of the rational part of the soul in accordance with virtue. This is because the good of a human being must have something to do with being human; and that which makes human beings human and gives us the potential to live a better life is our capacity to guide ourselves by using reason. If we use reason well, we live well as human beings; using reason well is what lead to well-being or happiness. Doing anything well requires virtue or excellence, and therefore living well consists in activities caused by the rational soul in accordance with virtue or excellence. However, why should the human function be one of these three things? Some critics have also questioned whether the good performance of this human function will necessarily make someone a morally good human being. Won’t this human function turn out to be a capacity that can be used either for good or for evil?
Even if we were to acknowledge that a human being who performs the human function well is (in some sense) a good human being, we can still ask whether it is good for a human being to be a good human being. We can ask whether it will make the person happy. This criticisms might be seen as arising from a misconception of ‘’eudaimonia’’ as happiness having something to do with pleasure, or with the quality of the person’s experiences, or at least with some condition welcomed from the person’s own point of view. Maybe eudaimonia is rather referring to the happiness of the whole, not of any one part.
In this way nearly assumption linking the function argument with eudaimonia has been criticized. The idea that human beings even have a function could be seen as based on an illegitimate piece of teleological reasoning. There is something somehow fallacious in inferring that the good performance of this function, supposing that it did make you a good human being, would therefore lead to well-being or happiness in the common understanding of the term. The assumption that the good performance of the function would make you a good human being is called into question by the thought that any human capacity can be used excellently in a non-moral sense either for good or for evil. Even if these problems were resolved, Aristotle’s method of selecting the function by choosing the kind of life that is unique to human beings raises a whole new set of problems, since some critics can’t see why it should be the function that is unique.
I will now show how most criticisms can be answered through a deeper understanding of what Aristotle meant by ‘’function’’, ‘’virtue’’ and ‘’eudaimonia’’.
First of all, ‘’ergon’’ (function) refers to something wither than purpose. It can also be...

Other Papers Like Aristotle Function Argument

Nichomechean Ethics And One Critique Essay

3012 words - 13 pages more desirable than others, or whether a hierarchy of goods can be established, Aristotle claims that the search for the good is a search for the highest good. Aristotle argues that the highest good must, by definition, have three characteristics: first, that it be desirable for itself, second, that it not be desirable for some other good, and third, that all other goods be desirable for its sake.[-1: Korsgaard C. Aristotle's function argument. In

Aristotle Slavery Essay

1388 words - 6 pages Aristotle believes that some people are by nature slaves. What is his argument for that claim? Do you agree with Aristotle that a slave-holding society can be democratic? According to Aristotle, a slave is the property of its master, and that any piece of property can be regarded "as a tool enabling a man to live". The slave, therefore, is a living tool of the master, whose purpose is to allow the master to live well. A slave belongs to a

According To Aristotle, How Is It That Being A Good Person Will Also Lead To Happiness?

2279 words - 10 pages ultimate answer would be - because you wanted to become happy. Now if you were asked, why you wanted to become happy, the only answer would be - because you just wanted to become happy.There is an argument as to what constitutes happiness. Is it pleasure, honor, health, wealth, knowledge or something else? Aristotle clarifies that happiness is not found in living for pleasure because such a life is slavish. Nor is it found in seeking honor because

The Experiences of Shakespeare’s Twelfth Night, a Decadent or Aesthetic Influence

1292 words - 6 pages exemplified by Socrates' own frequent image making and by the philosophical poetry of the Republic itself. Aristotle developed in his doctrine of 'catharsis’ in which that defense rests upon views of practical knowledge and of the psychological resources of the average person that Plato would be unlikely to have accepted. On the other hand Aristotle uses his aesthetic views and expressions for argument to directly set up a method achieving the

Evaluate the Claim That the Souk Is Distinct from the Body

2095 words - 9 pages and the soul is its form. The form is the function of a living thing and the nature of a living things soul/form is contingent on type of living thing. At the bottom of the hierarchy are plants that function to grow and reproduce whilst animals’ function also consists of appetites. The human soul has a unique quality, the power of reason and ability to develop a moral compass. Aristotle uses the example of an axe to explain the soul and its

Explain How a Follower of Natural Law Theory Might Approach the Issue Surrounding Abortion

2242 words - 9 pages also be used to argue the existence of God in the teleological argument). Humans have a duty to conform to Natural Law. If they do not conform it is morally bad. St Thomas Aquinas linked his idea of Natural Law with Aristotle’s view that people have a specific nature, purpose and function. Aristotle said that not only does everything have a purpose, but also it achieves supreme good when it fulfill its purpose. Aristotle stated that the supreme

Mind and Body Debate

1363 words - 6 pages same entity and one cannot survive without the others, they are inseparable. Aristotle said that there is a soul ‘anima’. The anima or soul is the essence of life, therefore animals and plants have a soul, all living things have a soul. The function of soul is to give the potential of rational thought and activity ideally leading to life of virtue. Although Aristotle believes we have a soul he didn’t believe we could survive the death of the body

Atomism

2663 words - 11 pages indivisible.2. Furley: I will give a quick sketch of the case he makes for (b).10. Furley's argument for theoretically indivisible Democritean atoms.1. Aristotle says that atoms were postulated to meet (what he called) Zeno's "Dichotomy Argument." This would be either the paradox of the race course, or the paradox of plurality.2. But, as we have seen, both of these arguments of Zeno's are meant to show that infinite divisibility (whether physical

Argumentation Visualization: Development Through the Ages

2126 words - 9 pages precursors of argumentation visualization 5 Direct ancestors of argumentation visualization 6 Wigmore’s evidence chart 6 Toulmin’s graphical argument 8 Current state 9 Market overview 10 Challenges and trends 10 References 12 History of argumentation visualization Before we start, it would be appropriate to give a short definition of the concept in question. Argumentation visualization can be described as a set of methods used to

Utopian Society

1447 words - 6 pages everyone would return to their homes with their families and sleep to do the same the next day.This is the day in the life of a citizen to a utopian society. There are no problems and everyone is hard working all the time. No one worries about possession and dominance. Everyone lives a happy, hardworking life.A single person is a very controlled and peaceful being. An individual can take care of him/herself with complete satisfaction and no argument

Bacon Induction

1706 words - 7 pages Bacon Essay Francis Bacon had an idea of using induction to help the human mind understand and gain truthful knowledge of the natural world. The induction proposed by Bacon is different than the ones used in the past by Aristotle. This new method will bring about the most general axioms, using latent process, latent schematisms, and tables of presence, absence, and comparison. He identifies idols that inhibit our human understanding to gain

Related Essays

Reconstruct Aristotle’s Function Argument. Explain What Role The Concept Of Virtue Plays In Making The Conclusion More Determinate Or Precise. Evaluate And Critique This Argument. Does It Seem...

1960 words - 8 pages precise. Evaluate and critique this argument. Does it seem convincing, or is there a step in the argument that seems problematic? Aristotle’s function argument is a normative ethical theory which seeks to discover the morally good human life and that to which we ought to aim to in all of our deeds. Through the function argument, Aristotle finds that the good human life is a life that is lived in accordance with rational activity

Virtue And Happiness Essay

1819 words - 8 pages Happiness is the goal of every human beings according to Aristotle, however what does happiness imply? It is in his attempt to define happiness and to find a way to attain it that Aristotle comes across the idea of virtue. It is thus necessary to explain the relationship between these two terms. I will start by defining the good and virtue and then clarify their close link with the argument of function, I will then go into more details in

Aristotel Essay

5891 words - 24 pages exist separately. In order to verify his argument he introduced a new concept for soul/mind. Descartes uses 'consciousness' for soul/mind which is immediate self-awareness, so 'consciousness' or mind exists independently without corporeal thing. In other words, mind is completely separate from body. Now let us consider Aristotle's concept of mind or incorporeal thing.In De Anima book I, Aristotle examined almost all pre-Aristotelian theories. In

Plato V Aristotle Essay

1645 words - 7 pages others. The final good of human activity concerns politics (polis) This is because politics sets the laws. Aristotle said that we should be virtuous and act virtuously such as courage, in that a deficiency in this virtue is cowardice, while an excessively brave person is foolhardy. As Aristotles main argument for the good life is that a good life is understood in terms of a things function (How well they perform their function) he needed to find the