“Are Colleges Worth the Price of Admission?” by Andrew Hacker and Claudia Dreifus, presents proposals “that might begin to set things right’ (TSIS, 180) in education. Both professors, Hacker and Dreifus, studied institutions and interviewed higher education leaders, policy makers, and students across the country (180). According to their voluntary assignment, they acknowledged at first, their belief that “all Americans can do college work,” which basically provided a thesis for every proposal to follow within their article. Suggestions, such as persuading students to liberate their imagination instead of just focusing on a financial goal after graduating, or “replacing tenure with ...view middle of the document...
In my experience, I have had several professors without tenure who came to the classroom without a desire to go beyond just taking words from the textbook and slamming them onto the board for the entire time slot provided. All teachers, no matter what level their at in their career, have to remember their role, which is the same for each and every one of them: to be fully present as a teacher, a source of information to inspire and provoke debate, enlightenment, and ideas. In other words, I think that Hacker and Dreifus were attempting to create a valid point, but left out the fact that you can’t make generalizations about EVERY professor with tenure, or leave out facts about some professors without it. In my perspective, colleges are only worth the price of admission in our economic state if we fix the inside of the system first. I am lucky enough to be at a college that I can afford. I came from another college that was far more expensive, so I completely understand what it’s like to try to do well at school while also hoping you can stay in school financially. In my mind, however, I don’t think the cost of higher education will significantly decrease, unfortunately. In the end, we all have to help each other. We’re not all individuals attending college. We’re a generation.
In their article”Are Colleges Worth the Price of Admission?” Andrew Hacker and Claudia Dreifus argue that people invest so much money in college, but college s do not feed back same value to their investor. They advocate 9 advice to help colleges go back their track of basic mission. In addition, Andrew Hacker and Claudia Dreifus give some colleges which is doing their job very well to support their view. They stress the point that colleges should train people’s mind, and be a voyage with information.
Andrew Hacker and Claudia Dreifus argues for “allow fewer sabbaticals.”(181) I do agree allow few sabbaticals, but I do want to make a more sabbaticals. Because students need new knowledge. The more new books or new articles, the more fresh knowledge . Knowledge is endless, so we do not keep learn knowledge from old books. If we do not renew our knowledge, what is the meaning we go to school. Therefore, schools need few sabbaticals to better conduct their research.
Andrew Hacker and Claudia Dreifus, their proposals of “make students use their minds.”(180)is extremely useful it sheds light on the problem of most students do not like thinking. They always choose the major which is less consideration. Colleges should help students concentrate on impractical studies which make students more thoughtful and interesting. Like Andrew Hacker and Claudia Dreifus say”undergraduate years are an interlude that will never come again”(180)students should grasp the chance when they are in college.
Although I agree with Andrew Hacker and Claudia Dreifus, their proposal which mention to set school go back right track. I can not accept their advice are more focus on schools....