12 Angry Men Reviews Quoted

698 words - 3 pages

12 Angry Men (1957)

Favourite Role:

My favourite casts in 12 Angry Men was Juror 8, who was played by Henry Fonda. He is one brave juror who voted 'not guilty' at the start of the deliberations because of his reasonable doubt. His role was firm and persuasive, he forces the other men to slowly reconsider and review the shaky murder case and eyewitness testimony against the endangered defendant. 

Favourite Scene:

My favourite scene was when Juror 4 do not believe the boy’s alibi that he was at the movies while the murder was taking place as the boy could not remember the title of the movie and the actors in it. Then, Juror 8 stated that it was due to the boy being devastated that the father was murdered that caused him to forget. Next, Juror 8 did a test on Juror 4 on the events that happened on previous days and he had difficulty doing so. Juror 8 then said that Juror 4 had no reason to face difficulty as he had not ...view middle of the document...

Particular Scene/Dialogue:

"Juror 8: Look, this kid's been kicked around all of his life. You know, born in a slum. Mother dead since he was nine. He lived for a year and a half in an orphanage when his father was serving a jail term for forgery. That's not a very happy beginning. He's a wild, angry kid, and that's all he's ever been. And you know why, because he's been hit on the head by somebody once a day, every day. He's had a pretty miserable eighteen years. I just think we owe him a few words, that's all."  

From this dialogue, it made me pity the boy and also, respect Juror 8. This is because, this dialogue shows that the boy has a poor background and his struggles in life. And after all he has been through, the other Jurors are being stereotype toward him and accusing him of a crime just because he has a poor background. Also, for Juror 8, I respect him because, he understands the boy and doesn’t judge the boy based on his background like the other jurors.


The main setting of the location in the film was in a small private room where all the jurors gathered together to decide whether the boy is guilty of murder. In addition, the set-up of cameras were in different angles and close-ups to capture the juror's discussions and arguments. Thus, the audiences would have a clearer view of discussions.

This classic, black and white film has been accused of being stagey, static and dialogue-laden. It also has no flashbacks, narration, or subtitles. The camera is essentially locked in the enclosed room with the deliberating jurors for 90 of the film's 95 minutes, and the film is basically shot in real-time in an actual jury room.

Cinematographer Boris Kaufman, who had already demonstrated his on-location film-making skill in Elia Kazan's On the Waterfront (1954) in Hoboken, and Baby Doll (1956) in Mississippi, uses diverse camera angles (a few dramatic, grotesque close-ups and mostly well-composed medium-shots) to illuminate and energize the film's cramped proceedings. Except for Henry Fonda, the ensemble character actors were chosen for their experience in the burgeoning art of television.

Other Papers Like 12 Angry Men Reviews Quoted

12 Angry Men Essay

785 words - 4 pages The film 12 Angry Men depicts the challenge faced by a jury as they deliberate the charges brought against an 18 year old boy for the first degree murder of his father. Their task is to come to an impartial verdict, based on the testimony which was heard in court. The group went through the common stages of group development as presented in the text; forming, storming, norming, and performing (Robbins, & Judge, 2010) while personal prejudices

12 Angry Men Essay

1530 words - 7 pages The Final Verdict of 12 Angry Men On the average, about five parents are killed by their biological children in the United States every week. Matricide and patricide are both very rare events when considered in terms of the thousands of individuals arrested every year for murder. Killings of mothers and fathers each constitute about 1 percent of all homicides in the United States in which the victim-offender relationship is known. Did he do it

12 Angry Men

4618 words - 19 pages 12 Angry Men Webster University PROC 5840 Character Listing Juror One - Martin Balsam Juror Two - John Fiedler Juror Three - Lee J. Cobb Juror Four - E.G. Marshall Juror Five - Jack Klugman Juror Six - Edward Binns Juror Seven - Jack Warden Juror Eight - Henry Fonda Juror Nine - Joseph Sweeney Juror Ten - Ed Begley Juror Eleven - George Voskovec Juror Twelve - Robert Webber Major Case Issues An 18 year-old man is being

12 Angry Men

5538 words - 23 pages . J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2010). Negotiation: Readings, exercises, and cases. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin. Fonda, H. (Producer), & Lumet, S. (Director). (1957). 12 angry men [Motion picture]. United States of America: Orion-Nova Productions.

12 Angry Men Film Analysis

548 words - 3 pages 12 Angry Men Film Analysis 25 October 2010 Film Analysis The film, 12 Angry Men (1957), is a drama about a jury that was to decide the fate of a teenaged boy who was facing the electric chair for supposedly killing his father with a switchblade knife. The twelve men were locked into a small, claustrophobic jury room on an unbearably hot summer day until they came up with a unanimous decision - either guilty or not guilty. Over the course of

Consensus and 12 Angry Men

885 words - 4 pages I recently watched a dramatic “case study” on group behavior and communication: the 1957 movie 12 Angry Men. The movie shows how one individual shaped and ultimately changed the direction of a group decision. The story goes that 12 jurors must reach a verdict that could require the death penalty for an 18-year-old defendant charged with stabbing his father to death. The jurors must reach consensus—the verdict must be unanimous. When they

12 Angry Men Movie Analysis

805 words - 4 pages Twelve Angry Men Analysis BA 321 Reaching a unanimous vote, beyond a reasonable doubt, was a difficult task for the jurors represented in the film, 12 Angry Men. All but one were convinced the boy on trial was guilty of first degree murder based on eye witness testimony and circumstantial evidence. Uncomfortably hot and sweaty, one intent on getting to a ball game, eleven of the twelve jurors had no intention to stop and

12 Angry Men Barriers Communication

1245 words - 5 pages Barriers in Communication: 12 Angry men Juror 1: He tries to organize the entire discussion and give it a structured approach. He facilitated the entire proceedings of the discussion be it casting a secret ballot or allowing everyone to voice their opinion. However he did not provide with any specific inputs to the entire discussion. Juror 2: He just went with the flow with a lack of ability to reason out of his own. Because it was his first

Belonging; the Crucible and 12 Angry Men

1248 words - 5 pages Crucible” and Sidney Lumet’s movie take on Reginald Rose’s screenplay “12 Angry Men”. Likewise, a feeling of disconnectedness and disparity is explored as strong themes in both texts through the idea that individuals will adhere to their own moral bearings despite the pressure of majority’s, thus evicting themselves from gaining a sense of belonging. Both texts have guided the notion of belonging to depend upon ones morals. If an individual is

The Power Of Leadership In 12 Angry Men

1833 words - 8 pages us individuality – the diversity that allows a democratic system to thrive. Like seen in Juror Eight, good leaders will appeal to varying methods of cognition. Not forcing people to agree or follow them, but leading them to genuinely want to. By presenting viewers with an example of a microcosmic system of democracy, 12 Angry Men illustrates the principle that true leadership is not derived from power, but is a characteristic seen in

12 Angry Men Critical Analysis - Differences And Similarities Between The Book And The Movie

1116 words - 5 pages In Twelve Angry Men, a boy is convicted of the murder of his father and 12 jurors are chosen to decide his fate. In the beginning, all of the evidence points to him being guilty. However, after a little bit of analysis of the evidence, there is some reasonable doubt. Slowly all of the Jurors accept the boy as innocent except for one very stubborn juror: Juror 3. The differences and similarities between the stage directions and the director’

Related Essays

12 Angry Men Essay 1050 Words

1050 words - 5 pages 12 Angry Men Analysis In the movie “12 Angry Men” there is a young man on trial for murder. The year is 1957, so the jury consists of all white, middle class to upper class, middle aged and up men. Some of their occupations consist of architect, salesman, broker and a man in advertisement. Which if you know anything about a jury today it is completely different. You have many different people of all race, gender, and social class, within that

12 Angry Men Essay 811 Words

811 words - 4 pages Elizabeth Herrera April 23, 2014 Comm 151 12 Angry Men: Communication Analysis In the film, 12 Angry Men, viewers come across a group of men who display the different communication dynamics – both the positive and negative sides. Chapter 7 encompasses the idea of Group and Team Communication Skills and how one should communicate effectively among others. To help better understand, 12 Angry Men is centered on a jury’s deliberation in a

12 Angry Men Assignment

2041 words - 9 pages individually perceive the case. Because the Jurors perceptions are unique it leads to complications in the communication process. In the film “12 Angry men” Juror no. 3 decides beforehand that it is an “open and shut case”. He validates his verdict by using emotionally laden language which eventually influences and persuades the other jury members. “This kid’s a dangerous killer, you could see it”, “Stabbed his own father, four inches into the

12 Angry Men Essay 717 Words

717 words - 3 pages 12 Angry Men Writing Assignment Final Exam Project Due: ________________________________________ (EDMODO) You will see a lot of psychological phenomena exhibited in the movie 12 Angry Men. Many of these phenomena are listed in the boxes on the next page. Your task for this assignment is to watch the movie, take note of these various psychological phenomena, and then write a cohesive 2-3 page paper discussing these themes. In writing your