This website uses cookies to ensure you have the best experience. Learn more

12 Angry Men Film Analysis

548 words - 3 pages

12 Angry Men Film Analysis
25 October 2010
Film Analysis
The film, 12 Angry Men (1957), is a drama about a jury that was to decide the fate of a teenaged boy who was facing the electric chair for supposedly killing his father with a switchblade knife. The twelve men were locked into a small, claustrophobic jury room on an unbearably hot summer day until they came up with a unanimous decision - either guilty or not guilty. Over the course of the film the votes went from eleven guilty and one not, to a unanimous vote of ‘not guilty’. The movie provides many examples of persuasive speaking, group communication and conflict, and different communication climates.
In the movie Henry Fonda’s character made good use of his persuasive ...view middle of the document...

He never out-right said he thought that the defendant was innocent, only that he believed there to be some doubt as to the certainty of his guilt. “It's always difficult to keep personal prejudice out of a thing like this. And wherever you run into it, prejudice always obscures the truth. I don't really know what the truth is. I don't suppose anybody will ever really know. Nine of us now seem to feel that the defendant is innocent, but we're just gambling on probabilities - we may be wrong. We may be trying to let a guilty man go free, I don't know. Nobody really can. But we have a reasonable doubt, and that's something that's very valuable in our system. No jury can declare a man guilty unless it's SURE. We nine can't understand how you three are still so sure. Maybe you can tell us.” Fonda’s arguments were logical and unemotional unlike those of Jurors Three and Ten who, once their ‘evidence’ dried up, continued to vote guilty based on racist bigotry and a personal vendetta.
At the beginning of the deliberation process the jury was very much of a ‘groupthink’ mentality. If we all think he’s guilty, then he obviously must be. When Fonda’s character broke from the group and called them out on their decision, he forced them to defend their decision. With less pressure to conform with the group’s answer, others on the jury also started questioning the supposed facts of the case. In the end when Juror Three was the only one still voting guilty he gave in to the peer pressure and changed his vote.
I believe that 12 Angry Men is an excellent movie to use when analyzing group communication and conflict, different communication climates, as well as the use of persuasive speaking.

Other Papers Like 12 Angry Men Film Analysis

12 Angry Men Essay

785 words - 4 pages The film 12 Angry Men depicts the challenge faced by a jury as they deliberate the charges brought against an 18 year old boy for the first degree murder of his father. Their task is to come to an impartial verdict, based on the testimony which was heard in court. The group went through the common stages of group development as presented in the text; forming, storming, norming, and performing (Robbins, & Judge, 2010) while personal prejudices

12 Angry Men Essay

4618 words - 19 pages 12 Angry Men Webster University PROC 5840 Character Listing Juror One - Martin Balsam Juror Two - John Fiedler Juror Three - Lee J. Cobb Juror Four - E.G. Marshall Juror Five - Jack Klugman Juror Six - Edward Binns Juror Seven - Jack Warden Juror Eight - Henry Fonda Juror Nine - Joseph Sweeney Juror Ten - Ed Begley Juror Eleven - George Voskovec Juror Twelve - Robert Webber Major Case Issues An 18 year-old man is being

12 Angry Men

717 words - 3 pages 12 Angry Men Writing Assignment Final Exam Project Due: ________________________________________ (EDMODO) You will see a lot of psychological phenomena exhibited in the movie 12 Angry Men. Many of these phenomena are listed in the boxes on the next page. Your task for this assignment is to watch the movie, take note of these various psychological phenomena, and then write a cohesive 2-3 page paper discussing these themes. In writing your

12 Angry Men Essay

1530 words - 7 pages The Final Verdict of 12 Angry Men On the average, about five parents are killed by their biological children in the United States every week. Matricide and patricide are both very rare events when considered in terms of the thousands of individuals arrested every year for murder. Killings of mothers and fathers each constitute about 1 percent of all homicides in the United States in which the victim-offender relationship is known. Did he do it

12 Angry Men - 5538 words

5538 words - 23 pages . J., Saunders, D. M., & Barry, B. (2010). Negotiation: Readings, exercises, and cases. New York: McGraw-Hill Irwin. Fonda, H. (Producer), & Lumet, S. (Director). (1957). 12 angry men [Motion picture]. United States of America: Orion-Nova Productions.

12 Angry Men Reviews Quoted

698 words - 3 pages 12 Angry Men (1957) Favourite Role: My favourite casts in 12 Angry Men was Juror 8, who was played by Henry Fonda. He is one brave juror who voted 'not guilty' at the start of the deliberations because of his reasonable doubt. His role was firm and persuasive, he forces the other men to slowly reconsider and review the shaky murder case and eyewitness testimony against the endangered defendant.  Favourite Scene: My favourite scene

12 Angry Men Barriers Communication

1245 words - 5 pages Barriers in Communication: 12 Angry men Juror 1: He tries to organize the entire discussion and give it a structured approach. He facilitated the entire proceedings of the discussion be it casting a secret ballot or allowing everyone to voice their opinion. However he did not provide with any specific inputs to the entire discussion. Juror 2: He just went with the flow with a lack of ability to reason out of his own. Because it was his first

Consensus and 12 Angry Men

885 words - 4 pages I recently watched a dramatic “case study” on group behavior and communication: the 1957 movie 12 Angry Men. The movie shows how one individual shaped and ultimately changed the direction of a group decision. The story goes that 12 jurors must reach a verdict that could require the death penalty for an 18-year-old defendant charged with stabbing his father to death. The jurors must reach consensus—the verdict must be unanimous. When they

Belonging; the Crucible and 12 Angry Men

1248 words - 5 pages Crucible” and Sidney Lumet’s movie take on Reginald Rose’s screenplay “12 Angry Men”. Likewise, a feeling of disconnectedness and disparity is explored as strong themes in both texts through the idea that individuals will adhere to their own moral bearings despite the pressure of majority’s, thus evicting themselves from gaining a sense of belonging. Both texts have guided the notion of belonging to depend upon ones morals. If an individual is

12 Angry Men Critical Analysis - Differences And Similarities Between The Book And The Movie

1116 words - 5 pages In Twelve Angry Men, a boy is convicted of the murder of his father and 12 jurors are chosen to decide his fate. In the beginning, all of the evidence points to him being guilty. However, after a little bit of analysis of the evidence, there is some reasonable doubt. Slowly all of the Jurors accept the boy as innocent except for one very stubborn juror: Juror 3. The differences and similarities between the stage directions and the director’

The Power Of Leadership In 12 Angry Men

1833 words - 8 pages individuals who possess an ability to pragmatically gain genuine support from their peers. Works Cited Fonda, Henry, perf. 12 Angry Men. Screenplay by Reginald Rose. Dir. Sidney Lumet. Prod. Reginald Rose and Henry Fonda. United Artists, 1957. Film. Gandhi, Mohandas Karamchand. Young India, Volume 9. N.p.: Navajivan Publishing House, 1927. Print. Vol. 9 of Young India. Interview by Arthur Gordon and Rudyard Kipling. June 1935. Rafter, Nicole

Related Essays

12 Angry Men Movie Analysis

805 words - 4 pages Twelve Angry Men Analysis BA 321 Reaching a unanimous vote, beyond a reasonable doubt, was a difficult task for the jurors represented in the film, 12 Angry Men. All but one were convinced the boy on trial was guilty of first degree murder based on eye witness testimony and circumstantial evidence. Uncomfortably hot and sweaty, one intent on getting to a ball game, eleven of the twelve jurors had no intention to stop and

12 Angry Men Essay 811 Words

811 words - 4 pages Elizabeth Herrera April 23, 2014 Comm 151 12 Angry Men: Communication Analysis In the film, 12 Angry Men, viewers come across a group of men who display the different communication dynamics – both the positive and negative sides. Chapter 7 encompasses the idea of Group and Team Communication Skills and how one should communicate effectively among others. To help better understand, 12 Angry Men is centered on a jury’s deliberation in a

12 Angry Men Assignment

2041 words - 9 pages individually perceive the case. Because the Jurors perceptions are unique it leads to complications in the communication process. In the film “12 Angry men” Juror no. 3 decides beforehand that it is an “open and shut case”. He validates his verdict by using emotionally laden language which eventually influences and persuades the other jury members. “This kid’s a dangerous killer, you could see it”, “Stabbed his own father, four inches into the

12 Angry Men Essay 1050 Words

1050 words - 5 pages 12 Angry Men Analysis In the movie “12 Angry Men” there is a young man on trial for murder. The year is 1957, so the jury consists of all white, middle class to upper class, middle aged and up men. Some of their occupations consist of architect, salesman, broker and a man in advertisement. Which if you know anything about a jury today it is completely different. You have many different people of all race, gender, and social class, within that